刘建芳,郑 枢,赵海军,刘 芳.中美食品防护法规对比研究[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2019,10(2):546-550 |
中美食品防护法规对比研究 |
Comparative study on Chinese and American food defense regulations |
投稿时间:2018-11-14 修订日期:2018-12-26 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 食品安全 食品防护 中美法规 |
英文关键词:food safety food defense regulations in China and the United States |
基金项目:湛江市财政资金科技专项项目(2017A01006、2016A01003)、原广东出入境检验检疫局科研计划项目(2017GDK51) |
|
|
摘要点击次数: 959 |
全文下载次数: 523 |
中文摘要: |
美国于2016年5月出台了《保护食品防止被故意污染的缓解策略》(121法规), 基本建立法案-规定-指南的法规体系。近年来, 我国在食品防护的研究方面不断取得进展, 制定了推荐性国家标准、出台食品防护工作指南, 初步建立食品防护法规体系, 但与美国食品防护法规相比, 在法律约束力、完整性、可操作性等方面尚有差距。本文从中美主要食品法规研究角度出发, 分析中美食品防护法规的研究现状、差别及各自特点, 对我国目前食品防护法规实践过程中存在的问题提出解决建议, 为进一步完善我国食品防护法规体系提供参考。 |
英文摘要: |
In May 2016, the United States introduced the “Relief Strategy for Protecting Food from Intentional Pollution” (121 Code), and basically established a regulatory system for the act-regulation-guide. In recent years, China has made continuous progress in the research of food defense, formulated recommended national standards, issued guidelines for food defense work, and initially established a food defense regulatory system. However, compared with the US food defense regulations, there are still gaps in legal binding, integrity, and operability. This paper analyzed the research status, differences and respective characteristics of food defense regulations in China and the United States, and proposed solutions to the existing problems in the current practice of food laws and regulations in China, in order to provide reference for improving the food defense regulation system. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|