区域全面经济伙伴关系协定成员国农产品准入监管及检验检测关键技术标准研究

Regional comprehensive economic partnership countries’ agricultural products access regulatory system and key technology standards for inspection and testing research

中文关键词:  RCEP  农产品  准入  监管  检验检测  技术标准

英文关键词:regional comprehensive economic partnership  agricultural products  admittance  regulation  inspection and testing  technology standards

中文摘要:

      2022覆盖15个成员国的区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(regional comprehensive economic partnership, RCEP)正式生效, 中国农业发展和农产品贸易迎来更多机遇和挑战。为加大对RCEP成员国技术性贸易措施的关注和研究, 本文对日本、韩国、澳大利亚和新西兰4个国家的农产品准入和监管制度进行了分析, 对比了成员国对合格评定结果的采信方式以及基于风险分析的进口农食产品监管模式。中国是日本、韩国、澳大利亚和新西兰墨鱼及鱿鱼和大蒜的最大进口来源国, 本文针对两类农产品, 将我国农药残留、兽药残留、重金属及污染物的限量标准和检测标准与4个国家分别进行了对比, 我国在限量标准的数量上与4个成员国相比存在一定差距。针对成员国独有的限量要求, 我国所制定的检测标准覆盖仍不够全面。本研究的相关数据及结论可为农产品出口企业管理、检验检测机构能力提升、合格评定机构认证认可互认研究、商务部及海关促进贸易增长和通关便利化服务提供参考。

英文摘要:

      On 2022, the regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement (RCEP) covering 15 member countries officially came into effect, ushering in more opportunities and challenges for China’s agricultural development and agricultural trade. In order to increase the attention and research on technical trade measures of RCEP member countries, this paper analyzed the access and regulatory systems of agricultural products in 4 countries, namely, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, and compared the ways of member countries’ acceptance of conformity assessment results as well as the mode of regulation of imported agri-food products based on risk analysis. China is the largest source of import of cuttlefish and squid and garlic from Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. This paper compared China’s limit standards and testing standards for pesticide residues, veterinary drug residues, heavy metals and pollutants for the 2 types of agricultural products with those of the 4 countries, and there is a certain gap between China’s number of limit standards and those of the 4 member countries. For the unique limit requirements of the member countries, the coverage of the testing standards formulated in China is still not comprehensive enough. The data and conclusions of this study can be used as a reference for the management of agricultural export enterprises, the capacity improvement of inspection and testing organizations, the research on mutual recognition of conformity assessment bodies, and the services of the Ministry of Commerce and the Customs Department in promoting trade growth and customs clearance facilitation.