王冰峰,徐贞贞,张星联.基于网络信息的中国食用农产品经济利益驱动型掺假的分析研究[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2021,12(21):8597-8603
基于网络信息的中国食用农产品经济利益驱动型掺假的分析研究
Analysis and research on economic motivated adulteration of Chinese edible agricultural products based on network information
投稿时间:2021-07-22  修订日期:2021-10-23
DOI:
中文关键词:  经济利益驱动型掺假  食用农产品  网络信息
英文关键词:economic motivated adulteration  edible agricultural products  network information
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1601701)
作者单位
王冰峰 中国农业大学食品科学与营养工程学院 
徐贞贞 中国农业科学院, 农业质量标准与检测技术研究所 
张星联 中国农业科学院, 农业质量标准与检测技术研究所 
AuthorInstitution
WANG Bing-Feng College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University 
XU Zhen-Zhen Institute of Quality Standard & Testing Technology for Agro-products, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences 
ZHANG Xing-Lian Institute of Quality Standard & Testing Technology for Agro-products, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences 
摘要点击次数: 477
全文下载次数: 293
中文摘要:
      目的 通过分析中国食用农产品经济利益驱动型掺假(economically motivated adulteration, EMA)信息, 为构建符合我国国情的食用农产品EMA数据库提供数据基础。方法 以部委官方网站、农产品质量安全舆情库、食品伙伴网、人民网、腾讯等主流媒体为数据来源, 对2012年4月至2021年3月的中国农产品掺假事件进行搜索。经过多轮筛选, 将食用农产品EMA事件的相关信息按照产品类别、发现日期、产品名称、发现地点、产品来源地、信息来源、产品类别、掺假类型、掺入物信息、具体事件描述等进行录入, 并对其中的697条EMA事件进行统计分析。结果 中国食用农产品EMA信息来源主要为监督抽检和媒体报道; EMA事件发生排名前8的类别为家畜类、蔬菜及其制品、饮料作物产品、粮食及其副产品、家禽类、果品、香辛料、鱼, 占所有EMA事件的80.34%; 非法添加是掺假中最常见的手段, 在种植业产品、畜牧业产品、水产品3大类中都高居榜首, 分别占比84%、63%和87%; 掺假环节涉及生产、加工、贮运、销售, 其中加工环节复杂度更高, 掺假相对占比更重。结论 EMA事件的风险防范已成为全球性的热点问题, 建立食用农产品EMA数据库能够为我国食用农产品EMA的预防控制提供数据基础和技术支撑。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the economic motivated adulteration (EMA) information of Chinese edible agricultural products, so as to provide a data basis for constructing the EMA database of edible agricultural products in line with China's national conditions. Methods Taking the official websites of ministries and commissions, public opinion database on quality and safety of agricultural products, food partner network, people's network, Tencent and other mainstream media as data sources, the adulteration events of agricultural products in China from April 2012 to March 2021 were searched. After several rounds of screening, the relevant information of EMA events of edible agricultural products were entered according to product category, discovery date, product name, discovery location, product source, information source, product category, adulteration type, admixture information and specific event description, and 697 EMA events were statistically analyzed. Results The information sources of EMA of edible agricultural products in China were mainly supervision and sampling and media reports; the top 8 categories of EMA events were livestock, vegetables and their products, beverage crop products, grain and its by-products, poultry, fruits, spices and fish, accounting for 80.34% of all EMA events; illegal addition was the most common means of adulteration, ranking first in the three categories of planting products, animal husbandry products and aquatic products, accounting for 84%, 63% and 87% respectively; adulteration links involved production, processing, storage, transportation and sales, among which the processing links were more complex and the proportion of adulteration was heavier. Conclusion The risk prevention of EMA events has become a global hot issue, the establishment of EMA database of edible agricultural products can provide data basis and technical support for the prevention and control of EMA of edible agricultural products in China.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器