基于逼近理想解排序法和秩和法综合评价我国食品药品综合检验机构发展概况

Comprehensive evaluation of the development of national food and drug inspection institutions with technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution and rank sum ratio methods

中文关键词:  食品药品检验机构  逼近理想解排序法  秩和法  综合评价

英文关键词:food and drug inspection institutions  technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method  rank sum ratio method  comprehensive evaluation

中文摘要:

      目的 综合评价全国食品药品综合检验机构发展基本情况。方法 选取各地市任务量、从业人员总数、硕士以上人员数量、实验室总面积、固定资产、大型仪器价值、科研课题总数等7个分别与全国食品药品综合检验机构总数的比例做为评价指标, 运用逼近理想解排序法法与秩和比法相结合的方法进行综合评价并分档。结果 广东省食品药品综合检验机构发展评为“优”(概率单位(Probit)>7.0); 北京、上海、山东、四川、浙江、江苏、湖北、辽宁等省市结果评为“良”(5.5≤概率单位(Probit)≤7.0); 天津、重庆、河北、河南、山西、吉林、陕西、黑龙江、甘肃、江西、安徽、内蒙古、云南、湖南、广西、海南、新疆、贵州结果评为“中”(4.0≤(概率单位(Probit)<5.5); 福建、宁夏、青海、西藏、新疆兵团等省市结果评为“缓”(概率单位(Probit)<4.0), 经方差分析具有统计学意义(F=567.085, P<0.001)。结论 应整合经济欠发达和人口稀少地区的食品药品检验资源, 避免重复投入, 提升检验能力; 同时做大做强东部发达地区食品药品综合检验机构, 集团化品牌化, 更好地发挥食品药品机构的科技支撑作用, 从而更好的保障人民群众饮食用药安全有效。

英文摘要:

      Objective To comprehensively evaluate the development of ’national food and drug inspection institutions. Methods The ratios of the total number of tasks, total number of employees, number of persons with master degree or above, total area of laboratories, fixed assets, value of large instruments and total number of scientific research projects in each city to the total number of national food and drug inspection institutions were selected as the evaluation indexes, then evaluated comprehensively and classified by the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method and rank sum ratio (RSR) method. Results Guangdong were evaluated as “excellent” (Probit>7.0), Beijing, Shanghai, Shandong, Sichuan, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Hubei, and Liaoning were evaluated as “good” (5.5≤ Probit ≤7.0), Tianjin, Chongqing, Hebei, Henan, Shanxi, Jilin, Shanxi, Jilin, Shanxi, Heilongjiang, Gansu, Jiangxi, Anhui, Nei Monggol, Yunnan, Hunan, Guangxi, Hainan, Xinjiang, Guizhou were evaluated as “fair” (4.0≤Probit<5.5), and Fujian, Ningxia, Qinghai, Xizang, and Xinjiang were “slow” (Probit<4.0). Those indexes were significantly different based on variance analysis (F=567.085, P<0.001). Conclusion Food and drug inspection resources in underdeveloped and sparsely populated areas should be integrated to avoid duplication of investment and improve inspection capabilities. At the same time, the comprehensive food and drug inspection institutions in the developed eastern regions will be enlarged and strengthened, and the brand will be grouped, so that the scientific and technological support role of the food and drug institutions can be better utilized to better ensure the safety and effectiveness of the people's diet and medication.