李 娜,郭莹莹,江艳华,姚 琳,王联珠.我国与国际食品法典委员会关于水产品中食品添加剂使用规定的对比分析[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2020,11(24):9169-9176 |
我国与国际食品法典委员会关于水产品中食品添加剂使用规定的对比分析 |
Comparative analysis of regulations on uses of food additives in aquatic products between China and Codex Alimentarius Commission |
投稿时间:2020-10-15 修订日期:2020-12-03 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 水产品 食品添加剂 对比分析 |
英文关键词:aquatic products food additives comparative analysis |
基金项目:现代农业产业技术体系专项资釐资助项目(CARS-50)、中国水产科学研究院基本科研业务费(2020TD71)、国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1406805) |
|
|
摘要点击次数: 684 |
全文下载次数: 410 |
中文摘要: |
对于国内食品企业, 食品添加剂标准的修订对规范企业行为, 加强食品安全具有重要作用。在国际贸易中, 水产品中食品添加剂的使用问题已成为我国水产品技术性贸易壁垒产生的主要原因。本文详细地对比分析了GB 2760-2014《食品安全国家标准 食品添加剂使用标准》与CODEX STAN 192-1995, Rev 2019《食品添加剂通用法典标准》中关于水产品中可使用的食品添加剂规定。 在水产品分类、允许使用的食品添加剂种类、功能与限量等方面比较分析了我国与CAC国际标准的异同。探讨了我国水产品中食品添加剂使用过程中存在的问题并提出了具体的对策和建议, 以期提高我国水产品质量。 |
英文摘要: |
For domestic food enterprises, the revision of food additive standards plays an important role in standardizing enterprise behavior and strengthening food safety. In the international trade, the use of food additives in aquatic products has become the main cause of technical barriers to trade in aquatic products in China. This paper made a detailed comparative analysis between GB 2760-2014 “National food safety standard-Standard for use of food additives” and CODEX STAN 192-1995, Rev 2019 “codex general standard for food additives” on food additives that could be used in aquatic products. The similarities and differences between China and CAC international standards in the classification of aquatic products, permitted to use food additives, functions and limits were compared and analyzed. It discussed the problems existing in the use of food additives in aquatic products in China and put forward the concrete countermeasures and suggestions, in order to improve the quality of aquatic products in China. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|