颜孙安,黄 彪,林香信,刘文静,姚清华.6种鲜食葡萄营养成分比较分析[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2021,12(1):283-290
6种鲜食葡萄营养成分比较分析
Comparison and analysis of nutritional components of 6 kinds of table grapes
投稿时间:2020-08-05  修订日期:2020-12-18
DOI:
中文关键词:  葡萄  品种  营养  氨基酸  矿质元素
英文关键词:grape  variety  nutrition  amino acid  mineral element
基金项目:国家农产品质量安全风险评估重大专项(GJFP201701505)、福建省公益类科研院所专项(2019R1022-1)、福建省农业科学院农产品质量安全创新团队项目(STIT2017-1-12)
作者单位
颜孙安 农业农村部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(福州);福建省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所;福建省农产品质量安全重点实验室 
黄 彪 农业农村部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(福州);福建省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所;福建省农产品质量安全重点实验室 
林香信 农业农村部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(福州);福建省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所;福建省农产品质量安全重点实验室 
刘文静 农业农村部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(福州);福建省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所;福建省农产品质量安全重点实验室 
姚清华 农业农村部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(福州);福建省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所;福建省农产品质量安全重点实验室 
AuthorInstitution
YAN Sun-An Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology Research, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Fujian Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agri-Products 
HUANG Biao Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology Research, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Fujian Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agri-Products 
LIN Xiang-Xin Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology Research, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Fujian Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agri-Products 
LIU Wen-Jing Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology Research, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Fujian Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agri-Products 
YAO Qing-Hua Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology Research, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Fujian Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agri-Products 
摘要点击次数: 735
全文下载次数: 387
中文摘要:
      目的 比较我国6种鲜食葡萄主栽品种营养成分的差异。方法 采用理化分析方法对葡萄的氨基酸等营养成分进行测定, 采用统计学方法比较分析品种间的营养差异。结果 6种鲜食葡萄的脂肪、灰分、纤维、总酸、半胱氨酸、甘氨酸和磷含量差异不显著(P>0.05); 夏黑葡萄的蛋白、总糖、还原糖、总花色苷、维生素C、必需氨基酸、风味氨基酸、支链氨基酸、药用氨基酸、增香与着色氨基酸、伯胺基氨基酸、K、Fe和Cu的含量均最高; 巨玫瑰的总黄酮、总多酚、Ca、Mg和Mn的含量均最高; 红地球的氨基酸比值系数评分和P含量最高, 氨基酸营养均衡性最佳。结论 不同品种鲜食葡萄营养差异明显, 具有不同的潜在开发应用价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the differences in nutritional components of six main varieties of table grapes in China. Methods The amino acid and other nutrients of grapes were determined by physical and chemical analysis methods, and the nutritional differences between varieties were compared and analyzed by statistical methods. Results The differences of contents of fatty, ash, fiber, total acid, cysteine, glycine, and phosphorus in six kinds of table grapes were not significant (P>0.05). The content of protein, total sugar, reducing sugar, total anthocyanins, vitamin C, essential amino acid, flavoring amino acid, branched chain amino acid, medical amino acid, flavoring and coloring amino acid, primary amine amino acid, K, Fe, and Cu in Summer Black grape were all highest. The contents of total flavonoids, total polyphenols, Ca, Mg, and Mn in Muscat Kyoho grape were all highest. Red globe grape had the highest amino acid ratio coefficient score and P content, and the amino acid nutritional balance was best. Conclusion Different varieties of table grapes have obvious nutritional differences and different potential development and application value.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器