王 丹,李 梅,王丹慧,郭丽娟,李 慧,高鹏飞,智丽慧,孟庆红,赵军妮.生乳中体细胞快速检测技术的对比研究[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2020,11(16):5742-5746
生乳中体细胞快速检测技术的对比研究
Comparative study on rapid detection of somatic cells in raw milk
投稿时间:2020-07-06  修订日期:2020-08-13
DOI:
中文关键词:  体细胞数  生乳  试剂盒法  快速仪器法  显微镜法
英文关键词:somatic cell count  raw milk  kit method  rapid instrument method  microscopic method
基金项目:呼和浩特市科技计划项目(2017-高-2)
作者单位
王 丹 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
李 梅 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
王丹慧 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
郭丽娟 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
李 慧 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
高鹏飞 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
智丽慧 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
孟庆红 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
赵军妮 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 
AuthorInstitution
WANG Dan Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
LI Mei Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
WANG Dan-Hui Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
GUO Li-Juan Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
LI Hui Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
GAO Peng-Fei Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
ZHI Li-Hui Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
MENG Qing-Hong Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
ZHAO Jun-Ni Inner Mongolia Mnengniu Dairy(guoup)Co., LTD 
摘要点击次数: 580
全文下载次数: 463
中文摘要:
      目的 建立一种检测生乳中体细胞含量的快速检测方法(试剂盒法)。方法 本试剂盒法通过生物酶溶解奶样中的蛋白质, 缓冲液稳定脂肪球和蛋白并改变体细胞通透性, 细胞裂解液及荧光染料快速渗透进入体细胞并沾染DNA, 培养过程中, 染液进入DNA的双螺旋结构, 与DNA结合后荧光量子产率明显提高, 最后通过荧光信号探测系统捕捉荧光强度来测定生乳中的体细胞数量。结果 该方法与快速仪器法对比, 相关系数达94%以上, 2种方法在统计学上无显著性差异(P>0.05)。与标准方法对比, 针对同一样品的检测结果的Log差值小于0.25, 2种方法统计学上也无显著性差异(P>0.05)。对不同样品进行重复性检测, 相对标准偏差均小于15%。结论 该试剂盒法具有较高的准确度和精密度, 检测结果与标准方法和市售仪器快速检测法无明显差异, 检测时间缩短50%, 提升了检测效率。由于无需大型的检测设备及配套试剂, 适合牧场和企业实验室的快速定量检测。
英文摘要:
      Objective To establish a rapid detection method(kit method) for the content of somatic cells in raw milk. Methods In this kit method, proteins in milk samples were dissolved by biological enzymes. The buffer solution stabilized fat globules and proteins, and changed the permeability of somatic cells. Cell lysate and fluorescent dyes quickly penetrated into the somatic cells and stained with DNA. During the culture process, the dye solution entered the double helix structure of DNA. After binding with DNA, the fluorescence quantum yield was significantly increased. Finally, the fluorescence intensity was captured by fluorescence signal detection system to determine the number of somatic cells in raw milk. Results Compared with the rapid instrument method, the correlation coefficient was over 94%, and there was no significant difference between the two methods (P>0.05). The Log difference for the same sample was less than 0.25 compared with the standard method, and there was no significant difference between the two methods statistically (P>0.05). When the repeatability of different samples was tested, the relative standard deviation were less than 15%. Conclusion The rapid detection technology has high accuracy and precision, and there is no significant difference of the results between the standard method and the rapid detection method of the market instrument. The detection time is shortened by 50%, and the detection efficiency is improved. Because no large-scale testing equipment and matching reagents are needed, it is suitable for rapid quantitative detection in pastures and enterprise laboratories.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器