王诗雨,李 洲,任文龙,卢玉军,吕婧怡,肖 静.层次分析法构建南通市餐饮食品安全监管量化分级评价方法应用研究[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2020,11(15):5173-5178
层次分析法构建南通市餐饮食品安全监管量化分级评价方法应用研究
Study on the application of analytic hierarchy process in the construction of quantitative grading evaluation method of food safety supervision in Nantong
投稿时间:2020-04-24  修订日期:2020-07-28
DOI:
中文关键词:  层次分析法  餐饮  食品安全  量化分级  权重
英文关键词:analytic hierarchy process  food and beverage  food safety  quantitative grading  weight
基金项目:南通市科技局项目(MS12018052)、江苏省大学生实践创新训练计划项目(201710304076Y)
作者单位
王诗雨 南通大学公共卫生学院 
李 洲 南通大学公共卫生学院 
任文龙 南通大学公共卫生学院 
卢玉军 南通大学公共卫生学院 
吕婧怡 南通大学公共卫生学院 
肖 静 南通大学公共卫生学院 
AuthorInstitution
WANG Shi-Yu School of Public Health, Nantong University 
LI Zhou School of Public Health, Nantong University 
REN Wen-Long School of Public Health, Nantong University 
LU Yu-Jun School of Public Health, Nantong University 
LV Jing-Yi School of Public Health, Nantong University 
XIAO Jing School of Public Health, Nantong University 
摘要点击次数: 798
全文下载次数: 348
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨餐饮服务食品安全监管新型量化分级评价标准, 提高监管效能。方法 采用统一制定的专家评分表, “一对一”访谈, 对5个业态量化分级指标的相对重要性打分; 层次分析法确定指标的权值。 结果 本次调查专家权威性较高, 各个专家对不同业态量化分级指标的重要性程度判断一致性较高CR<0.1, 权重值计算合理, 重点项检查指标的权值相对较高, 能区分出重点项和一般项。不同业态的一级指标权值顺位差异不大, 各二级指标的权值体现出了一定的区分度, 但在不同业态中也反应出一些差异。结论 本次评定的餐饮服务食品安全监管新型量化分级评价标准合理有效, 具有广泛应用价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the new quantitative grading evaluation standard of food safety supervision in catering service, and improve the supervision efficiency. Methods The relative importance of 5 quantitative classification indexes was scored by the unified expert rating table which was produced by "one-to-one" interview. The weights of the indexes were established by analytic hierarchy process. Results The authority of these surveys’ expert was relatively high, the experts had high consistency in judging the importance of quantitative classification indicators of different formats CR<0.1, the calculation of the weight value was reasonable, and the weight of the key item inspection index was relatively high, key items and general items were distinguished. The weights of the first-level indicators of different formats were not significantly different. The weights of the second-level indicators reflected a certain degree of differentiation, but they also reflected some differences in different formats. Conclusion The new quantitative grading evaluation standard for food safety supervision of catering services is reasonable and effective, and has wide application value.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器