祝子铜,雷美康,彭 芳,陈玉娇,章应俊,徐佳文,安钦燕.液质联用测定水产品中硝基呋喃类代谢物 残留量的不确定度评定[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2015,6(7):2857-2862
液质联用测定水产品中硝基呋喃类代谢物 残留量的不确定度评定
Uncertainty evaluation in determination of nitrofuran metabolites residues in aquatic product by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
投稿时间:2015-06-04  修订日期:2015-07-17
DOI:
中文关键词:  液相色谱-串联质谱法  水产品  硝基呋喃类代谢物  不确定度测定
英文关键词:high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry  aquatic product  nitrofuran metabolites residues  uncertainty evaluation
基金项目:衢州市科技计划项目
作者单位
祝子铜 衢州出入境检验检疫局 
雷美康 衢州出入境检验检疫局 
彭 芳 衢州出入境检验检疫局 
陈玉娇 衢州出入境检验检疫局 
章应俊 衢州出入境检验检疫局 
徐佳文 衢州出入境检验检疫局 
安钦燕 衢州出入境检验检疫局 
AuthorInstitution
ZHU ZI-Tong Quzhou Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
LEI Mei-Kang Quzhou Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
PENG Fang Quzhou Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
CHEN Yu-Jiao Quzhou Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
ZHANG Ying-Jun Quzhou Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
XU Jia-Wen Quzhou Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
AN Qin-Yan Quzhou Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
摘要点击次数: 1545
全文下载次数: 1599
中文摘要:
      目的 采用液相色谱串联质谱法对水产品中硝基呋喃类代谢物的残留量进行测量不确定度评定。方法 根据农业部783号公告-1-2006的前处理方法进行处理, 根据JJF 1059.1-2012《测量不确定度的评定与表示》等相关理论, 通过建立数学模型, 对测量结果的各不确定度来源进行分析和量化。结果 当硝基呋喃类代谢物的添加水平为2.0 ng/mL时, 4种硝基呋喃类代谢物结果可表示为呋喃西林代谢物(2.114±0.114) ng/mL, k=2; 呋喃妥因代谢物(2.162±0.124) ng/mL, k=2; 呋喃它酮代谢物(1.880±0.107) ng/mL, k=2; 呋喃唑酮代谢物(2.076±0.097) ng/mL, k=2。结论 在确定的实验条件下, 本方法的不确定度主要来自于仪器设备测试引起的峰面积的变化, 呋喃西林代谢物和呋喃妥因代谢物方法的回收率也是一个主要影响因素。
英文摘要:
      Objective To establish a mathematical model of uncertainty evaluation of nitrofuran metabolites residues in aquatic product by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Methods Based on The Ministry of Agriculture announcement No.783-1-2006, JJF 1059.1-2012 Evaluation and expression of uncertainty in measurement and other theories, a mathematical model was constructed and each component of uncertainty in the whole measuring process was analyzed and quantified. Results The results showed that when the spiked level was 2.0 ng/mL, the expanded uncertainty was USEM (2.114±0.114) ng/mL, k=2; UAHD(2.162±0.124) ng/mL, k=2; UAMOZ(1.880±0.107) ng/mL, k=2; and UAOZ(2.076±0.097) ng/mL, k=2. Conclusion Under determined experimental conditions, the major uncertainty sources were the area of determination and the recovery of method.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器