GB 31621—2014《食品安全国家标准 食品经营过程卫生规范》跟踪评价结果分析

Analysis of follow up evaluation results of GB 31621—2014 National food safety standard-Hygienic standard for food business process

中文关键词:  食品安全国家标准  GB 31621—2014  食品经营过程  卫生规范  跟踪评价

英文关键词:national food safety standard  GB 31621—2014  food business process  hygienic standard  tracking evaluation

中文摘要:

      目的 分析GB 31621—2014《食品安全国家标准 食品经营过程卫生规范》发布以来的标准实施情况, 掌握标准执行过程中的主要问题。方法 收集食品安全国家标准管理平台中“常态跟踪评价”板块中2016—2020年对该标准的反馈意见, 并使用Excel 2019软件对数据进行导入及整理, 进行描述性统计分析。对意见反馈较多的内容进行讨论, 为标准修订提供建议。结果 截止2020年12月, GB 31621—2014在平台上共收到有效意见433条, 其中反馈最多的为企业人员。在意见类型中, 对标准指标和技术要求的反馈最多。在各章节的反馈中, 对“贮存”章节的意见最多。反馈意见较多的有: 网络食品经营活动、农副产品合格证明文件、运输环节的温度要求、产品召回时通知消费者的方式、标准中条款的具体化等方面。结论 GB 31621—2014发布时间较长, 应当重新考虑标准中反馈意见较多条款的适用性和可行性, 根据我国食品经营过程现状, 在充分调研的基础上, 适时进行标准修订。

英文摘要:

      Objective To analyze the implementation of GB 31621—2014 National food safety standard-Hygienic standard for food business process, so as to grasp the main problems in the implementation of the standard. Methods The feedback on the national food safety standard from 2016 to 2020 in the "Normal Tracking Evaluation" section of the national food safety standard management platform was collected, and the data was imported and sorted by using Excel 2019 software for descriptive statistical analysis. The contents with more feedback were discussed to provide suggestions for the revision of the standard. Results As of December 2020, totally 433 pieces of valid opinions have been received on the platform of GB 31621—2014, among which people from enterprises gave the most feedback. Among the types of opinions, most feedback was given to standard indicators and technical requirements. The "storage" section received most feedback among all the sections. The opinions mainly focused on the following aspects: Online food business activities, agricultural and sideline products qualification documents, temperature requirements during transportation, the way to notify consumers when products were recalled, and the concretization of clauses in the standard. Conclusion GB 31621—2014 has been published for a long time, so it is necessary to reconsider the applicability and feasibility of the clauses with many feed-back opinions in the standard. According to the current situation of food business process in China, the standard should be revised timely on the basis of full investigation.