洪颖,肖震,郝俊虎,蒋鲁岩,王毅谦,吴福平,邵景东,蒋 原,封莉,黄明,祝长青.牛奶中无乳链球菌DNA提取方法的比较[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2015,6(12):4832-4838
牛奶中无乳链球菌DNA提取方法的比较
Comparison of different methods for DNA extraction of Streptococcus aga-lactiae in milk
投稿时间:2015-12-01  修订日期:2015-12-14
DOI:
中文关键词:  牛奶  无乳链球菌  DNA提取  紫外分光光度计法  实时荧光PCR
英文关键词:milk  Streptococcus agalactiae  DNA extraction  ultraviolet spectrophotometry  real time fluorescence PCR
基金项目:江苏省科技支撑计划(BE2013732)
作者单位
洪颖 江苏出入境检验检疫局 
肖震 江苏出入境检验检疫局 
郝俊虎 宁夏出入境检验检疫局 
蒋鲁岩 江苏出入境检验检疫局 
王毅谦 江苏出入境检验检疫局 
吴福平 江苏出入境检验检疫局 
邵景东 江苏出入境检验检疫局 
蒋 原 江苏出入境检验检疫局 
封莉 南京农业大学 
黄明 南京农业大学 
祝长青 江苏出入境检验检疫局 
AuthorInstitution
HONG Ying Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
XIAO Zhen Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
HAO Jun-Hu Ningxia Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
JIANG Lu-Yan Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
WANG Yi-Qian Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
WU Fu-Ping Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
SHAO Jing-Dong Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
JIANG Yuan Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
FENG Li Nanjing Agricultural University 
HUANG Ming Nanjing Agricultural University 
ZHU Chang-Qing Jiangsu Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau 
摘要点击次数: 1898
全文下载次数: 1711
中文摘要:
      目的 以牛奶中的致病性无乳链球菌作为研究对象, 对9种常用的细菌核酸提取方法进行比较。方法 选用紫外分光光度计法和实时荧光PCR法对各方法进行系统评估。结果 超声波处理结合天根吸附柱的方法能提取到得率较高、纯度较好的DNA, 结合实时荧光PCR法后对牛奶中无乳链球菌的检测灵敏度能达到90 cfu; 天根吸附柱法提取所得DNA得率稍低, 结合实时荧光PCR法后对牛奶中无乳链球菌的检测灵敏度也能达到90 cfu; 溶菌酶法和超声波破碎提取法用于实时荧光PCR后对牛奶中无乳链球菌的检测灵敏度能达到350 cfu; Chelex-100法更适于纯菌的检测, 该法结合实时荧光PCR法对无乳链球菌的检测灵敏度能达到350 cfu的灵敏度。结论 应根据样品类型、方法要求和检测成本来选择适合的核酸提取方法。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the 9 extraction methods of extracting the DNA from Streptococcus agalactiae in milk. Methods The methods were evaluated by using ultraviolet spectrophotometry and real time fluorescence PCR. Results The results showed that the purity and yield of genomic DNA by TianGen adsorption column method with sonication was the most suitable one among the 10 methods. The low detection limit in milk of TianGen adsorption column method and TianGen adsorption column method with sonication were 90 cfu. Enzymolysis method, sonication method and TianGen adsorption column method were fitted for the detection of Streptococcus agalactiae in milk, while Chelex-100 method was fitted for the detection of Streptococcus agalactiae in pure bacteria. The low detection limit in milk of enzymolysis method and sonication method were both of 350 cfu, and the low detection limit in pure bacteria of Chelex-100 method was 350 cfu. Conclusion The appropriate nucleic acid extraction method should be decided according to sample types, methods and testing cost.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器